AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1045/080
*Corresponding Author: Jonathan Lakey, Professor, Departments of Surgery and Biomedical Engineering University of California Irvine.
Citation: Z Villaverde, T Tucker, M Alexander, Scott A. Hepford, JRT Lakey, et al. (2021) Improved Kidney Function Following Physiologic Insulin Resensitization Treatment Modality. Endocrinology and Disorders. 5(4): DOI:10.31579/2640-1045/080
Copyright: © 2021 Jonathan Lakey. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 07 July 2021 | Accepted: 28 July 2021 | Published: 30 July 2021
Keywords: diabetes; chronic kidney disease; treatment modality; physiological insulin resensitization
Diabetes affects millions of people worldwide and is a leading cause of amputation, blindness, neuropathy, and chronic kidney disease. Chronic kidney disease results in the prolonged impairment of kidney function. Common medications and lifestyle modifications do not eliminate the long-term complications of diabetes, because they lack the ability to restore the periodic cycle of insulin that exists in healthy physiology. Our study used a precise administration of exogenous insulin, mimicking the physiologic profile of insulin secretion, which is more effective at stabilizing cellular blood glucose uptake and reducing diabetic complications than current drug and lifestyle modifications alone.
In this case study report, we evaluated three diabetic or pre-diabetic patients who showed improvements in kidney function after beginning this treatment modality. We monitored their chronic kidney disease symptoms before and after the physiological insulin resensitization (PIR) process.
We showed that the patients improved in kidney function after several months based on their laboratory metrics and CKD stage classification.
Diabetes mellitus affects millions of people worldwide, and its complications cost hundreds of billions of dollars to treat. Diabetes is a metabolic disorder that affects the way humans metabolize glucose [1]. Glucose is of vital importance to human health, as it is the main energy molecule for muscles and organs such as the brain. Diabetes is typically identified via sustained hyperglycemia [1]. This hyperglycemia is caused by at least one defect along the insulin secretion and reception pathway in the body [1].
The two most common types of diabetes are Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes [1]. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease that results in the immune system destroying insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. T1D typically manifests itself in early adolescence, and T1D patients are dependent on exogenous insulin for survival [1]. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the more common of the two and is typically believed to be caused by inadequate insulin secretion from the pancreas or decreased cellular response to insulin [1]. Onset of T2D is typically believed to be associated with obesity or poor diet [1]. In people developing T2D, hyperglycemia is caused by either a decrease in insulin sensitivity, a failure to produce enough insulin or both. In the case of decreased insulin sensitivity, abnormal insulin secretion from the pancreas results in consistent exposure of cells to insulin. Cells consequently downregulate the associated insulin receptors, and the patient takes up less glucose into his or her cells, prompting the pancreas to produce more insulin in a positive feedback loop [1]. Eventually, the patient has so few responsive receptors that glucose cannot be taken up into cells, and the patient suffers from chronic hyperglycemia [1]. In the case of insulin deficiency, genetic defects or chronic overproduction of insulin can result in not enough insulin being secreted from the pancreas. In this case, hyperglycemia is sustained because a patient does not produce enough insulin for the cells to uptake the glucose in the bloodstream [1]. Both of the above scenarios result in T2D characterized by hyperglycemia, which can lead to other detrimental effects on the body.
One potential effect of diabetes is increased inflammatory response. Inflammation has been hypothesized to originate from decreased insulin sensitivity, as well as obesity and increased lipolysis [2]. Insulin has been shown to suppress certain inflammation-promoting transcription factors such as IL-6, CRP, and TNF-α. Diabetes can decrease production or uptake of insulin, which removes the suppression of these transcription factors and results in inflammation [2]. Type 2 diabetics can develop obesity because their blood sugar is not being effectively metabolized; thus, the body stores the blood sugar as fat before it can be utilized through the fat metabolism pathway [2]. Obesity results in increased numbers of adipocytes, which constitutively express inflammatory markers, like IL-6 and CRP as mentioned above [2]. Finally, increased lipolysis because of T2D results in higher free fatty acid concentrations in the blood, which contributes to increased cellular oxidative stress through the buildup of oxygen radicals, and tissue inflammation [2]. The combination of sustained hyperglycemia and inflammation in the body as a result of diabetes contributes to many of the complications that arise in diabetic patients [2].
Many complications can arise from chronic hyperglycemia and inflammation associated with diabetes and other metabolic disorders. Some of the more common complications include cardiovascular disease, wound ulceration, peripheral neuropathy in limbs, and nephropathy leading to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and kidney failure [3]. Chronic kidney disease is of growing concern, as the number of people per year initiating treatment for diabetic CKD leading to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and dialysis increased more than 18-fold between 1980 and 2011, with numbers continuing to climb [3]. Diabetic CKD, also known as diabetic kidney disease (DKD), is also the single strongest predictor of mortality in diabetic patients, warranting it special attention in medicine [3].
Chronic kidney disease is the result of prolonged impairment of kidney function. Kidney function is best measured through a patient’s estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, or (e) GFR [4]. Clinically, a patient is diagnosed with CKD if he or she exhibits one or both of the following for at least three months: an eGFR of below 60mL/min or at least one other marker of kidney damage [4]. These markers include albuminuria or proteinuria, abnormal urine electrolyte levels, structural abnormalities in the kidney, and others [4]. Diabetic patients are at unique risk for developing CKD because two of the side effects of diabetes, hyperglycemia and inflammation, affect pathways that lead to impaired kidney function [3]. Hyperglycemia changes the typical progression of glycolysis in cells, resulting in upregulation of transcription factors and substrates that lead to glomerular hyperfiltration or capillary obstruction. Over time, hyperfiltration and blood vessel obstruction damage the kidneys and can result in DKD [3]. Inflammation results in increased levels of inflammatory cytokines in the blood, which are hypothesized to increase endothelial cell permeability as well as induce apoptosis in endothelial cells. Degradation of endothelial linings can contribute to abnormal amounts of protein or electrolytes in urine, as well as decreased eGFR in damaged nephrons [3].
Chronic kidney disease is generally separated into six stages based on a patient’s eGFR. Stage 1 CKD is “normal” and is characterized as an eGFR of 90 mL/min or higher. Stage 2 CKD is within the range of 60 mL/min to 89 mL/min, and kidneys are considered mildly impaired. Patients with an eGFR below 60 mL/min are then diagnosed with CKD and placed into CKD stage 3. Stage 3 is further divided into 3a and 3b and signals moderate impairment in kidney function. Stage 3a falls within eGFR ranges of 45 mL/min to 59 mL/min and stage 3b within 30 mL/min and 44 mL/min. CKD Stage 4 denotes significant impairment and risk for renal failure. Stage 4 eGFRs range from 15 mL/min to 29 mL/min. Below 15 mL/min is CKD Stage 5, which is essentially renal failure [4]. Patients at CKD Stage 5 are highly likely to require dialysis or a kidney transplant [4]. Dialysis and surgery can be costly and significantly impact a patient’s quality of life. Current widely accepted treatments focus on slowing the progression of CKD and attempt to restore “reversible” factors of CKD to normal to reduce its severity [5]. Once a diabetic patient begins to lose kidney function, however, it is extremely difficult to arrest this progression, because the underlying contributors, high blood sugar and inflammatory tissue damage, are still present in the patient. This study seeks to explore the effect of Physiologic Insulin Resensitization on diabetic and pre-diabetic patients in varying stages of CKD. More specifically, we want to determine whether physiologic insulin resensitization displayed any noticeable effects on the kidney function of patients currently receiving the treatment modality in a real-world clinical setting.
In our study, we utilize a novel therapeutic protocol that uses insulin as a biologic adjunct in treating the systemic complications of diabetes regarding kidney function. The advantage of this protocol is mimicking the body’s own method of insulin regulation, especially mimicking the normal physiologic and periodic insulin signaling. This protocol was designed to counter the negative effect of insulin messaging, as well as unopposed glucagon effect on reducing insulin receptor expression [2]. Effectively, this protocol serves as a potent adjunctive companion method to overcome insulin resistance, or insulin toxicity and improve carbohydrate metabolism.
This bio-mimicry precision dosing ranges dynamically between 4- to 8-minutes intervals where adjustments to concentrations, volumes, pressures, and oscillations of insulin are varied on an individualized basis. Oral glucose is used at individualized intervals to trigger carbohydrate metabolism, which as carbohydrate metabolism improves, ATP production is increased, and inflammatory markers are reduced, leading to higher available cellular energy [7].
The PIR precision dosing pattern of insulin is consistent with normal hormone secretion and more closely approximates the body’s natural signaling pathways. As the patient’s insulin resistance improves, healthcare providers can titrate other medications to optimize treatment regimens. In general, PIR permits lowering dosing of subcutaneous insulin and other diabetes medications, which often promote the secretion of insulin or inhibit the production of glucose and are costly [7]. This study was performed as an observational evaluation of patients who are already undergoing PIR treatment at Island Doctors and have their kidney function monitored as a part of the treatment.
Tables 1-3 are results from three male patients who have been on PIR infusion treatment for at least five weeks. These three patients were selected from more than 80 current patients for exceptional changes in metrics related to kidney function. Table 1 identifies patients based on their ID number at the clinic where they receive their PIR infusion treatments. Their ages are also noted. These patients range from 75 at the youngest to 85 at the oldest. It is worth noting that only one of the patients, patient 8, was referred to the PIR clinic for CKD stage 3. The other two patients were referred for other reasons relating to PIR. Only patient 32 is clinically diabetic. The other two patients are pre-diabetic, but all three of them have low eGFR scores that would classify them as CKD stage 3 or higher.
Table 2 outlines the relevant metrics for assessment of patient kidney function. Each of the three patients observed in this case study was on the treatment modality for at least 5 weeks prior to re-evaluation of these metrics. This translates to a minimum of 8-10 infusions for patient 32, and approximately 20 for patients 8 and 30 after 15 weeks of the treatment modality. The primary indicator for CKD, eGFR, showed a positive percent change between the base and the first test for each of the three patients. Patient 8 showed the highest percentage increase of 67%, but all three of these patients increased at least 25% in this short window of treatments. Furthermore, patient 8 regressed classification from CKD stage 3b to 3a, and patient 30 regressed from 3a to 2. These patients additionally showed decreases in both BUN and Creatinine in their urinalysis tests. The patients’ BUN scores decreased anywhere from 21% to 46% over this timeframe, and Creatinine decreased between 18% and 34%. These changes are all positive developments in kidney health of these patients.
Another development to note is the potassium level in patient 32. At the beginning of this treatment modality, this patient showed a potassium level of 5.9 mmol/L, which is higher than the normal upper boundary of 5.2. After 5 weeks of treatments, this patient showed a potassium of 4.3 mmol/L, decreasing 27%, and falling back within normal levels. Likewise, patient 8 showed potassium of 5.1mmol/L, which is almost at the upper limit of normal levels. After 15 weeks of treatments, that number decreased 8% to 4.7 mmol/L.
In terms of diabetes-specific results, Table 3 shows the change in each patient from their baseline labs. For the three patients, fasting blood glucose gave ambiguous results, with one patient decreasing, one patient increasing, and one staying roughly the same. However, Hemoglobin A1c did decrease in all three patients, even those who are not clinically diabetic. Hemoglobin A1C decreased most drastically in patient 32, the one patient of these three who is clinically diabetic, decreasing a full percentage point from 7.3% to 6.3%.
The link between insulin resistance and progressive CKD is becoming apparent as more research shows physiologic effects on the kidneys of insulin resistance. A 2012 study by the American Society of Nephrology noted insulin resistance as a known complication of ESRD. [8] The study went on to show an inverse relation between insulin resistance and measured eGFR, which is one of the key metrics in determining severity of CKD. [8, 9]. Diabetic patients suffer from insulin resistance with or without CKD and ESRD, but this study also notes that insulin resistance is prevalent in non-diabetic ESRD patients as well. [8]
The goal of the PIR treatment is to return insulin secretion to normal physiological conditions, thereby reducing the level of insulin resistance in affected patients. The patients sampled in the results above display increased eGFR, which is correlated with reduced insulin resistance in both the diabetic and nondiabetic patients. This is potentially attributable to the PIR treatment.
Insulin resistance has also been shown to create structural changes in the kidney, including excess proliferation of cells, apoptosis inhibition, and reduction in endothelial functionality [6]. All these effects carry a risk of kidney injury and progressive CKD [6]. The PIR modality recalibrates the endogenous production of insulin to its physiologic “pulse-rest” intervals, which may allow these alternative insulin-signaling pathways to regain ordinary functionality. This may result in a restructuring of kidney tissues back to normal, and furthermore an improvement in kidney function after beginning the PIR treatment modality.
The principal objective of this study was to determine if the PIR treatment modality has any noticeable effect on kidney function in patients with diabetic CKD. Given the above results, it is possible that this modality has positive effects on kidney function in diabetic patients. Because the study was a real-world analysis and not a controlled study with explicit variables, further data and studies are required to support this notion. The next steps after this preliminary case study would be design and execution of a full controlled study among diabetic patients with CKD, in which the independent variable is the PIR treatment modality itself.
This work was supported by internal funding by Well Cell Global LLC and volunteered time by providers and staff members at Island Doctors.
Dr. Roy Hinman, and Zach Villaverde are employees of Island Doctors, which administers the PIR treatment modality. Scott Hepford is employed by Well Cell Global LLC, which researches, advances and licenses the PIR treatment modality. Tori Tucker, Michael Alexander, and Dr. Jonathan Lakey are employees of the University of California Irvine and have no conflicts of interest in this study.
Patients provided their consent for anonymous inclusion of their data in publications.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
